This article is about MS 171 Vs MS 250 C-BE. The MS 171 and MS 250 C-BE are both great options for those looking for a powerful, yet lightweight saw. But what’s the difference between the two?
|MS 171||MS 250 C-BE|
|Power output kW/bhp||1,3/1,8||2,3/3,1|
|Weight kg||4,3 1)||4,9 1)|
|Power-to-weight ratio kg/kW||3,3||2,2|
|Sound pressure level dB(A)||99 2)||101 2)|
|Sound power level dB(A)||112 3)||111 3)|
|Vibration level left/right m/s²||4/4,5 4)||5,2/7,2 4)|
|Saw chain pitch ||3/8″P||3/8″P|
|STIHL Oilomatic saw chain type ||Picco Micro Mini 3 (PMM3)||Picco Micro 3 (PM3)|
STIHL MS 171
The MS 171 is a great choice for homeowners seeking a great value, as well as convenient features not usually found on basic chainsaws. The Easy2Start™ system makes starting STIHL chainsaws almost effortless, eliminating the need for a strong pull of the starting cord. Combined with the ergonomic design of the STIHL MS 171, this chainsaw is built for easy handling and comfortable operation.
Stihl MS 171 also has all of the comfort features you’ve come to expect from STIHL, including an anti-vibration system and side-access chain tensioner. STIHL designed an additional model in the small homeowner chainsaw category for those who want a little more power with fewer emissions. The STIHL MS 250 C-BE features the same Easy2Start™ system as the MS 171, but with a powerful fuel-efficient, low emission engine.
STIHL MS 250 C-BE
The MS 250 C-BE has all the same great features as the MS 250, but also includes a number of performance-enhancing and convenience-enhancing improvements. The top handle is redesigned with a rubberized grip to make handling easier. A side chain tensioning feature lets you adjust the chain without removing the bar, and an easy start decompression valve makes starting the saw much less strenuous.
In addition, the Stihl MS 250 C-BE has a preseparation air filtration system that cleans itself and requires less frequent cleaning than other models. It also comes standard with a 2/3-pitch .325″ Rapid Micro chain and is compatible with all of STIHL’s other .325″ chains. If you’re looking for a lightweight saw that will get your job done quickly and easily, either of these models will suit you well.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Engine Displacement
The most obvious difference between these two chainsaws is their size. The MS 171 has a smaller engine displacement than the MS 250 C-BE, which makes it best suited for lighter tasks like pruning and cutting small trees. The smaller engine also makes it more fuel efficient because it doesn’t need as much power to run efficiently.
You’ll also notice that they have different versions of the Ematic chain lubrication system. The Ematic chain lubrication system reduces oil consumption by up to 50 percent when compared with conventional methods of lubricating chainsaw bars, so it’s great for anyone who wants their equipment to last longer without having to spend more money on maintenance costs.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Power output
The STIHL MS 171 has a power output of 1.3 kW, while the MS 250 C-BE has a power output of 2.3 kW. That means that the MS 250 C-BE is nearly 50% more powerful than the MS 171. In terms of cutting performance, that means the MS 250 C-BE can handle tougher jobs, like cutting through thicker branches and tree trunks.
So, if you’re looking for a chainsaw that can handle the tougher jobs, the STIHL MS 250 C-BE is the way to go.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Weight
The weight of the STIHL MS 171 and MS 250 C-BE are quite different. The MS 171 weighs in at around 4.3 kg, while the MS 250 C-BE weighs around 4.9 kg. This may not seem like a lot, but it can make a big difference when you’re using the saw for extended periods of time. The extra weight of the C-BE can also be a bit much if you’re not used to it.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Power-to-weight ratio
The power-to-weight ratio is a measure of the amount of power that a machine can generate compared to its weight. In the case of the STIHL MS 171 and MS 250 C-BE, the power-to-weight ratio is very similar.
The STIHL MS 171 has a power output of 1.3 bhp and a weight of 4.3 kg, while the MS 250 C-BE has a power output of 1.5 bhp and a weight of 4.9 kg. This means that the MS 171 has a power-to-weight ratio of 0.21 bhp/kg and the MS 250 C-BE has a power-to-weight ratio of 0.21 bhp/kg.
While the power-to-weight ratio is similar for these two machines, the MS 250 C-BE does have a higher power output. This means that, for the same weight, the MS 250 C-BE will be able to generate more power than the MS 171.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Sound pressure level
Another comparison between these two chainsaws that we want you to know is about sound pressure level. STIHL MS 171 has sound pressure level of 112 dB, while STIHL MS 250 C-BE has 107 dB. A sound pressure level, which means that the latter makes less noise than the former one when being used and will not cause too much disturbance to people around you. 3. STI.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Sound power level
The STIHL MS 171 has a sound power level of 111 dB(A) and the STIHL MS 250 C-BE has a sound power level of 114 dB(A), both of which are fairly loud when compared to other chainsaws on the market. The noise level for the MS 171 is 104 dB(A) and 108 dB(A) for the MS 250 C-BE. In comparison, the average human voice is about 60 dB(A).
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Vibration level left/right
The vibration level in the handles has been measured and weighted according to a scale and formula known as the vibration total value. The STIHL MS 171 has a vibration level of 3.7 m/s², whereas the STIHL MS 250 C-BE is slightly higher at 4.0 m/s². While these are both still low levels, they do signify that you may feel more vibration through your hands when using the STIHL MS 250 C-BE chainsaw.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|Saw chain pitch
The saw chain pitch is the distance between the drive links on the saw chain. The most common pitches are 3/8″ and .404″. The MS 171 and MS 250 C-BE both have a 3/8″ pitch. This means that the distance between the drive links on the saw chain is 3/8″.
The saw chain pitch is important because it determines the size of the kerf, or the width of the cut that the chain makes. A saw with a smaller pitch will make a narrower kerf, while a saw with a larger pitch will make a wider kerf.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE|STIHL Oilomatic saw chain type
The MS 171 is a great saw for general purpose use, while the MS 250 C-BE is better suited for more demanding tasks. Both saws feature STIHL’s Oilomatic saw chain, which is a great choice for both saws.
The Stihl MS 171 is a great choice for anyone looking for a powerful and reliable chainsaw. It is a lightweight saw that is easy to maneuver, making it ideal for use in tight spaces. The MS 171 also has a low-emission engine, making it a good choice for those who are concerned about the environment.
The Stihl MS 250 C-BE is a great choice for anyone looking for a powerful and reliable chainsaw. It is a lightweight saw that is easy to maneuver, making it ideal for use in tight spaces. The MS 250 C-BE also has a low-emission engine, making it a good choice for those who are concerned about the environment.
STIHL MS 171 vs MS 250 C-BE, which is better?
The Stihl MS 171 is a great choice for anyone looking for a powerful, yet lightweight chainsaw. It is perfect for general homeowner use, as well as more demanding applications such as pruning and felling small trees. The MS 250 C-BE is a bit more expensive, but it is also a bit more powerful and features a number of convenient features that make it worth the extra cost. So, which one is the better choice?
The MS 171 is a great all-around chainsaw that is perfect for general use. It is lightweight and easy to maneuver, yet still has enough power to handle most tasks. It also has a number of features that make it a great choice for homeowners, such as an anti-vibration system and an automatic chain oiler.
The MS 250 C-BE is a bit more powerful than the MS 171, making it a better choice for more demanding tasks. It also features a number of convenient features, such as a built-in chainsaw sharpener and a chain brake. While it is more expensive than the MS 171, it is still a great value for the money.