If you’re in the market for a professional-grade chainsaw, you might find yourself torn between the Stihl 500i Vs the Husqvarna 592 XP. These models are widely regarded as top contenders for demanding tasks. In this comparison, we will analyze the spec, features, and overall value of each chainsaw to help you make an informed decision without delving into unnecessary details.
The Stihl 500i is a chainsaw made for homeowners who need to cut down big trees. Because it can easily cut through big logs, it is also great for making firewood. This saw’s safety system, which helps avoid kickbacks and makes it safer for users, is among its most crucial features. The 80cc Stihl 500i saw weighs around 26 pounds. This size is ideal for someone who wants a strong saw but doesn’t want to take along one that is excessively heavy.
Moreover, when working on big projects, like felling trees or cutting firewood, you won’t have to continuously check and apply oil manually because the saw features an automatic oiler. Your chain will always be kept lubricated by the automatic oiler, which will automatically add oil as needed.
Husqvarna 592 XP
Professional-grade chainsaw made for heavy-duty application, the Husqvarna 592 XP. With a 5.2-horsepower engine and a chain speed of up to 100 feet per second, it is one of the most potent saws in the Husqvarna series. The 592 XP weighs just over 10 pounds, making it one of the lightest saws in its class. Anyone who requires a robust and powerful chainsaw should consider the 592 XP. It is ideal for clearing bush, cutting firewood, and felling trees. Anyone looking for a saw that is simple to use and handle should consider this option as well.
Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP: Comparasion Detail
Here is Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP Spec sheet:
|Key Factor||Husqvarna 592 XP||Stihl MS 500i|
|Powerhead Weight||16.3 pounds||13.2 pounds|
|Fuel Capacity||29 oz.||26.5 oz.|
|Engine Power||8.3 bhp||18 – 24 inches|
Main Features of Stihl 500i:
- Fuel-injected Engine: It is for improved fuel efficiency and performance.
- Lightweight Design: The design of only 13.2 pounds for easy handling and reduced fatigue.
- Advanced Air Filtration System: The system protects the engine and minimizes clogging.
- User-Friendly Controls: With automated features for a hassle-free experience.
Main Features of Husqvarna 592 XP
- X-Torq Engine Technology: It is for improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions.
- Impressive Power Output: Powerful 92cc engine with 8.3 horsepower for effortless cutting of thick logs and shrubbery.
- Air Injection System: The system protects the air filter and prolongs the engine’s lifespan.
- AutoTune Technology: The technology that automatically adjusts the carburetor for optimal performance in any situation.
The weight of a chainsaw is an important consideration for many users, as it can affect the ease of handling and user comfort during operation. While the Husqvarna 592 XP weighs around 16.3 pounds with cutting equipment, the Stihl MS500i is significantly lighter at only 13.2 pounds, making it a more favorable option for those looking for a daily driver chainsaw.
Despite the lower weight, the Stihl MS500i does not compromise on power and performance, with its fuel-injected engine and advanced air filtration system delivering impressive cutting power and speed. Its lightweight design also minimizes fatigue and enhances user control, making it an excellent choice for both professionals and experienced users.
Power and Performance
When evaluating the power and performance of the Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP chainsaws, it is important to consider the motor, bar length options, and chain speed. The Stihl MS500i features a 79.2cc engine, delivering approximately 6.7 horsepower, while the Husqvarna 592 XP boasts a powerful 92cc engine that can reach up to 8.3 horsepower. In terms of raw power, the Husqvarna outperforms the Stihl.
Additionally, the Husqvarna chainsaw offers an advantage in terms of bar length compatibility, accommodating bars of up to 32 inches, whereas the Stihl MS500i can only handle up to a 28-inch bar. When it comes to chain speed, although the exact speed of the Stihl MS500i is not clearly stated, it is believed to be comparable to the 9600 RPM rotation speed of the Husqvarna 592 XP.
Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Both the Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP chainsaws have features that contribute to more efficient fuel use when considering fuel efficiency and emissions. The X-Torq engine of the Husqvarna 592 XP touts improved fuel economy, lowering both emission and consumption rates by almost 20%. This not only lowers fuel expenses but also lessens the environmental impact of carbon emissions.
The Stihl MS500i, on the other hand, features cutting-edge engine management technology that optimizes the air-to-fuel ratio, leading to little waste and effective fuel burning. Fuel expenses are ensured to stay low as a result. Although the Stihl MS500i tested somewhat more efficiently, there isn’t much of a difference between the two versions. Therefore, if a user prefers the Husqvarna 592 XP, there is no reason not to choose it based solely on fuel efficiency.
Ease of Use
The Husqvarna 592 XP Vs Stihl MS500i chainsaws both include features that make them easier to use when it comes to convenience. A superior air filtering system on the Husqvarna 592 XP impresses and lowers user maintenance needs. Especially when used for extended periods of time, its ergonomic design helps to reduce tiredness.
When it comes to ergonomics, the Stihl MS500i outperforms expectations. Users may carry the chainsaw for long periods of time without getting tired because of its lightweight build. Additionally, the Stihl MS500i’s air filtering system is excellent.
Ultimately, the choice of chainsaw is subjective and depends on individual preferences. However, for beginners, the Stihl MS500i receives high praise for its user-friendly design and ease of use.
About the price, the Husqvarna 592 XP is priced at around $1,500, while the Stihl MS500i is priced at around $1,600.The price difference between the two models is only around $100, which may not be significant but is still worth noting. The Husqvarna 592 XP is the more affordable option and provides decent value for the investment.
However, if the compact design of the Stihl MS500i appeals to you, it may be worth spending the extra $100. Ultimately, the choice should be based on personal preference. From an objective perspective, the Husqvarna 592 XP holds the advantage in terms of price. And you can check the latest price form here.
Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP: Which one should you buy?
When trying to decide between the Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP chainsaws, it’s important to consider your intended use for the tool. Do you prioritize ease of use and ergonomic design? Then the Stihl MS500i may be the right choice for you. Are you working with a tight budget? The more economical price point of the Husqvarna 592 XP may be a better fit.
Ultimately, the chainsaw that is best for you depends on your individual needs and preferences. Carefully evaluate each model before purchasing to ensure it meets your requirements for power, features, and durability. Consider the cost, ergonomics, and other factors that will affect your use of the chainsaw to make an informed decision.
What chainsaw is better a STIHL or Husqvarna?
The question of which chainsaw brand is better, STIHL or Husqvarna, is a matter of personal preference as both brands are known for producing high-quality chainsaws.
How much horsepower does a Husqvarna 592 have?
A Husqvarna 592 have 7.6 hp.
How many HP is the STIHL 500i?
The STIHL 500i is 6.7 bhp.
What CC is a Husqvarna 592 XP?
A Husqvarna 592 XP is 92.7cc.
Both the Stihl 500i Vs Husqvarna 592 XP chainsaws exhibit exceptional qualities that cater to the needs of professional users. The Stihl 500i stands out for its innovative fuel-injection technology, resulting in increased power and efficiency. On the other hand, the Husqvarna 592 XP impresses with its swift acceleration and superior cutting performance. The choice ultimately boils down to your specific requirements and personal preferences.