STIHL MS 171 Vs MS 231 : What’s The Difference

STIHL MS 171 Vs MS 231: STIHL MS 171 and the STIHL MS 231 are both two-cycle gasoline-powered backpack leaf blowers. They are both designed for homeowner use, so they have similar power ratings, but there are some slight differences between them. The main difference between these two blowers is that the MS 171 has a smaller engine and can only be used with a low-VOC fuel mixture while the MS 231 can use regular gas.

Detail Comparison

Technical specifications MS 171 MS 231
Displacement ­cm³ 31,8 42,6
Power output ­kW/bhp 1,3/1,8 2/2,7
Weight ­kg 4,3 1) 4,8 1)
Power-to-weight ratio ­kg/kW 3,3 2,4
Sound pressure level ­dB(A) 99 2) 103 2)
Sound power level ­dB(A) 112 3) 114 3)
Vibration level left/right ­m/s² 4/4,5 4) 3,9/3,9 4)
Saw chain pitch ­ 3/8″P 3/8″P
STIHL Oilomatic saw chain type ­ Picco Micro Mini 3 (PMM3) Picco Micro 3 (PM3)


The STIHL MS 171 is a chainsaw made for homeowners who want to do some light cutting and pruning around their homes. The MS 231 is a chainsaw made for professionals who need a powerful tool for heavy-duty tasks. The MS 171 is an entry-level saw with many of the same features as the more expensive saws in the STIHL lineup, but it’s not as powerful or durable. The MS 231 has a larger engine and better performance than the MS 171, it’s also heavier and more expensive than the MS 171. 

STIHL MS 171 Vs MS 231

It weighs just over 9 pounds empty so it’s easy to carry around while working with it. This saw comes equipped with a single chain pitch (0.325″ pitch), a low kickback safety chain, a dual-function trimmer head, low vibration handlebars, and an ergonomic throttle control system.


The STIHL MS 231 has been around for a few years now, but it remains one of the most popular chainsaws available on the market today. The machine is designed for professional use, but it’s also perfect for homeowners who need a powerful tool that will last for years. The STIHL MS 231 is powered by an easy-start engine with an automatic oil pump. This allows you to start your machine quickly and easily without having to mix gas and oil yourself.

The STIHL MS 231 is a powerful, compact, and lightweight chainsaw that is designed specifically for professionals. It delivers excellent performance and reliability, making it the ideal tool for demanding applications. The STIHL MS 171 is a lightweight chainsaw with easy starting features that make it perfect for homeowners and weekend warriors. It offers an excellent power-to-weight ratio and impressive cutting performance.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Engine Displacement

The STIHL MS 171 and STIHL MS 231 are both chainsaws that provide a lot of power for the homeowner. They are both high-quality chainsaws that deliver on performance and durability. The engine displacement is where these two models differ from each other significantly, however.

The STIHL MS 171 has a 4.3-cc, 2-stroke engine, whereas the STIHL MS 231 has a 4.8-cc, 2-stroke engine. The larger engine in the MS 231 has more power to offer and can cut through thicker pieces of wood more easily than its smaller counterpart, making it ideal for people who need to cut large amounts of wood or who are working with larger trees in their yards or properties.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Power output

The STIHL MS 171 is a mid-range chainsaw that’s powered by a fuel-efficient, low-emission engine. The MS 171 is the successor to the popular MS 170 and shares many of the same design features. While this saw is smaller than its big brother, the MS 211, it still packs a punch. It has a 30.1cc engine with 1.4 horsepower and is capable of cutting through trees up to 16 inches in diameter. Its compact size makes it ideal for homeowners who want a powerful tool without having to lug around bulky equipment all day long.

While the 171 does not have as much power as the 231, it does have some other benefits. It has an automatic chain lubrication system that keeps your chain from overheating or getting jammed up with dirt and debris while you’re working on projects outside of your home such as cutting down trees or pruning shrubs in your yard.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Weight

The STIHL MS 171 and the MS 231 are both gasoline-powered chainsaws. However, they are not the same model. The MS 171 is a mid-range saw that has a maximum cutting capacity of 16 inches. The MS 231 is a professional-grade saw with a maximum cutting capacity of 21 inches.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Power-to-weight ratio

The STIHL MS 171 and the MS 231 are both lightweight, powerful, and high-quality chainsaws. The STIHL MS 171 is a strong, reliable, and powerful chain saw that is excellent for any homeowner who wants to work with a professional-grade power tool. The STIHL MS 171 has an Oregon bar, which provides great durability and longevity.

This chainsaw has been designed to provide a high amount of power to weight ratio, which means that it doesn’t weigh a lot but can still cut through tough trees with ease. The MS 231 is also a great chainsaw that provides an excellent power-to-weight ratio, making it perfect for homeowners who want to trim or cut down trees while still being able to carry around the tool with ease.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Sound pressure level

When it comes to chainsaws, the name STIHL is one you can rely on. The brand has a reputation for quality and innovation, and its saws are popular among professionals and homeowners alike. STIHL’s lineup of chainsaws ranges from a light homeowner saw to a heavy-duty professional model, so they have something for everyone.

Two of the most popular chainsaw models in the homeowner range are the STIHL MS 171 and STIHL MS 231. But what are the differences between these two mid-range saws? Both the MS 171 and MS 231 are lightweight chainsaws with all-around functionality. They weigh 11 pounds with a 16″ bar length, making them perfect for trimming or felling small trees around your property, cutting firewood, or clearing fallen branches after storms. Both saws are also equipped with anti-vibration technology (STIHL’s ElastoStart feature), which makes them comfortable to use.

This feature reduces vibration levels significantly compared to older models, making them easier to hold onto for long periods of time without wearing down your hands or arms. The main differences between the MS 171 and MS 231 involve engine power and emissions control. 

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Sound power level

Both STIHL MS 171 and MS 231 are excellent choices for homeowners and occasional commercial users looking to get a reliable, lightweight chainsaw. Both are powered by the same engine, have the same bar length options (12 and 16 inches), and feature the same Easy2Start technology. So what’s the difference? STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|In practicality, both of these chainsaws perform equally well as long as you’re not planning to use it professionally.

It’s also true that if you’re just planning to clean up your yard every now and then, there really isn’t much of a difference between them. The price difference is marginal, but given their performance, we can definitely say that you get your money’s worth from either one. However, the STIHL MS 171 is slightly lighter than the STIHL MS 231. This makes it perfect for extended use because it creates less strain on the user’s arms and shoulders.

It is also easier to handle with its reduced weight, which makes it ideal for inexperienced users or those who have difficulty handling heavier power tools. It also has a smaller fuel tank than MS 231, so the weight reduction comes at the expense of some fuel capacity.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Vibration level left/right

The STIHL MS 171 and MS 231 are both chainsaws that are designed to be used by professionals. They are both powerful, lightweight, and easy to use. The main difference between the two is the vibration level and noise level. The MS 171 has a higher vibration level than the MS 231, which can cause fatigue and discomfort after extended use. The MS 231 also has a lower noise level than the MS 171, making it more suitable for working in close proximity to others. The STIHL MS 171 is a professional grade chain saw that is designed for commercial use in tough conditions.

It has a strong engine with a low kickback bar and chain design that reduces kickback by up to 75%. The low kickback means fewer accidents for users because there will be less chance of the chain breaking or getting stuck in the wood when cutting through it. The engine on the STIHL MS 171 uses fuel injection technology that provides better start-up performance than carburetion engines and also keeps emissions down at lower speeds so you can cut down on carbon dioxide emissions every time you use your chainsaw.

This makes it ideal for cutting wood with low moisture content such as logs or firewood that doesn’t need to be split apart first before being cut into pieces.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Saw chain pitch

STIHL is a leading manufacturer of outdoor power equipment, and both the STIHL MS 171 and the STIHL MS 231 are popular chainsaws designed for home use. While they appear to be very similar, there are a few key differences between them that can help you determine which chainsaw best fits your needs. 

Saw chain pitch The “pitch” of a saw chain refers to the distance between the drive links, or teeth, on the chain. Smaller pitch sizes require less power to cut through wood, but they also require more passes through the wood. Larger pitch sizes cut more quickly, but they also require more power and are harder to handle. The STIHL MS 171 has a 3/8″ Picco Micro 3 (PM3) saw chain with a small pitch size of 1/4″. This means it will be easier to handle than the STIHL MS 231, but you may need to make more passes through wood when cutting with it. 

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|STIHL Oilomatic saw chain type

The STIHL MS 171 is a midsize chainsaw that may be used for a variety of purposes. It is more powerful and efficient than the STIHL MS 170. The STIHL MS 231 is a step up from the STIHL MS 171. It has a higher power output, which makes it capable of doing more work in less time.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|Engine Power The STIHL MS 171 has an engine that produces 1.8 horsepower. This enables it to cut wood at a rate of 30 to 40 feet per second, depending upon its configuration. It is built with a single piston cylinder engine and its fuel tank is able to hold nine-tenths of a pint of fuel.

Its oil tank can hold 0.2 pints of oil, which allows it to run for up to 50 minutes before needing additional oil. The STIHL MS 231 has an engine that produces 2 horsepower. This enables it to cut wood at a rate of 33 feet per second, depending upon its configuration. It is built with a single piston cylinder engine and its fuel tank is able to hold one pint of fuel.

STIHL MS 171 vs MS 231|which is better

The STIHL MS 171 chainsaw is the perfect choice for homeowners looking to cut firewood or fell small trees, and it’s the smallest of our “Farm & Ranch” gas saws. The MS 171 is built around one of our new fuel-efficient engines with enough muscle to take on just about any task. It features a low-emission engine, toolless fuel and oil caps with retainers and an advanced anti-vibration system.

The STIHL MS 231 is one of the most popular chainsaw models among professional users who want a high-performance, mid-range saw. This model is ideal for felling, firewood cutting and storm cleanup, as well as for use in orchards, parks and municipalities. It has all the same great features as the MS 211 C-BE model but with a more powerful engine to handle tougher jobs.

If you have a large property that needs regular maintenance, you might be having trouble deciding if you should get a STIHL MS 171 Farm & Ranch Chainsaw or a STIHL MS 231 Professional Chainsaw for your needs. While both models are great choices for different reasons, there are some differences that can help you decide which chainsaw is best for your property.

The End

The MS 171 and MS 231 are both excellent tools for professional web and graphic designers, because they are digital versions of the original analog pastel pencils. However, there are distinct advantages to each one of these products that make them particularly useful in different situations. Whether you choose one over the other will depend on your job function and what you’re designing, but either way, you can be confident in your choice because these two tools are comparable in overall quality.